…
Why a smaller team works faster — and where your budget really goes.
A significant portion of the studio's budget goes to managers, approvals, office space, and accounting. You're paying for infrastructure, not just code. Timeline: from one month, much of which is communication. The result is often a site on a standard platform with a pile of add-ons, because "it's faster for us."
| Criterion | Web Studio | TimeKairos |
|---|---|---|
| Landing page price | $1,000–$2,000 | from $600 |
| Timeline | from 1 month | from 48 hours |
| Middlemen | 2–3 managers | Direct contact |
| Site speed | High | Maximum |
| Post-delivery edits | Usually paid | Included |
| You own the code | Depends on contract | 100% yours |
| Transparency | Usually closed | Online tracker |
| Large project (10+ pages) | Their strength | Not our focus |
A studio spends weeks on briefs, mockup approvals, and internal reviews. Your site is 5% of their portfolio. For us it's 100%. That's why we can launch a site from 48 hours, while a studio takes a month or more. And during that time without a site, you're losing clients.
Studio: $1,500 + a month of waiting = a month without clients. TimeKairos: from $600 + from 48 hours = site already working. Calculate: how many clients do you lose per month without a website? Even 2 clients is $600+ in missed revenue.
At a studio, your request goes through a manager, designer, developer, and QA. Each link in the chain means time and potential miscommunication. With us, one person is responsible for the entire project from start to finish. You say it — we build it. No "hold on, let me pass it to a colleague."
Compare two business website options for me: Option A: Web studio, $1,500 timeline from 1 month Option B: TimeKairos, $600 timeline 48 hours – 2 weeks Analyze: 1. ROI within the first year (accounting for lost clients during wait time) 2. Total cost over 2 years (tweaks, support, updates) 3. Site speed and its impact on client acquisition Give an objective answer with numbers.